
Rutgers
University was once one of the biggest party schools in the United States.
However, it has lost this statues due to the party ban that was put in place as a result of the death of a freshman at the
university. There are many questions about how this will effect Rutgers but focusing on one of the biggest questions out there is more
beneficial to understanding this ban. How is the ban on parties going to change
the campus? Will the ban improve campus life? Will the ban protect college
students from over drinking? Will the ban improve or destroy Rutgers
reputation?

The
Rutgers Campus in the past has had many crazy parties that have made news
headlines. Rutgers is known to be a place to go to if a student wa
nts to party
and “have a good time”. However, with the ban in place the campus, it has
become quieter and less hectic of a place. Some students argue that “it’s
boring on campus” since the ban has been put on the campus (CITE). On the
contrary, others have found alternatives to this ban through joining clubs or training harder in sports
rather than partying (CITE). With the sudden increase in free time, some
students have decided to make use of their time efficiently. Fraternity and sorority
are being more cautious as well and some have gone as far as to disband
chapters in Rutgers that have been misbehaving (CITE)
. For an example, the Sigma
Phi Epsilon fraternity has been ”suspended indefinitely at its Rutgers chapter”
due to the death of a freshman girl at the sorority’s house from alcohol
poisoning(Feeny). This disbandment of one of these sororities has made all
other fraternities and sororities more cautious on how the university looks at
them and tries to reduce over intoxication of alcohol of minors.

Since
the ban on parties, Rutgers has seen a significant drop in the amount of alcohol
consumption.
Though students are probably drinking
just as much or maybe even more than they were before, it is hiding from the
eyes of the university.
When trying to deny to someone something they start to want it
even more than they did before. The theory is
that people like to get stuff that is forbidden to them and when someone says
they can’t drink it makes them want to drink more.
Rutgers might reduce the amount of parties on their campus but they will not
reduce the amount of drinking. In fact, the amount of underground drinking on
campus is on the rise. It is hidden from the police and public safety officers
because students have become more secretive about their drinking on campus for
fear of getting into trouble. If the drinking is done out in the open, it can at
least be controlled so people do not over drink. Knowing that the parties and
drinking have been forced underground, there is going to be a lot more people
from Rutgers going to the emergency room due to over drinking because no one is
monitoring the situations. “Bottom line, the university can do whatever it
wants, but these kids are still going to party” (Heyboer). Not matter what the
campus does they cannot stop the students from partying. On the outside Rutgers
will look better, but on the inside it’s going to get a lot worse.
Works
Citied
Feeney, Nolan. “Rutgers Bans Frat
and sorority house parties.” U.S Education. Web. 16 April 2015.
Heyboer, Kelly.
“Reaction to Rutgers frat party ban mixed among nerberhood residence.” Mew
Jersey. Web. 16 April 2015.